DENVER -- An appeals court Thursday reopened a lawsuit stemming from a dispute over fishing in the Arkansas River near Cotopaxi.

The Chaffee County Times reported in 2018 he sued, asking a judge to declare that part of the riverbed belongs to the state and is open to public use, "so he can again safely fish (there)."

Last year, Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya of the U.S. District Court for Colorado ruled against Hill, concluding he did not have "standing" to sue. He then took his case to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

On Thursday, the Denver-based appeals court overturned Tafoya's decision, saying she erred that Hill lacked standing of the particular type she cited.

The appeals court, in its 2-1 decision, sent the case back to her to reconsider.

The appeals court said in its 12-page decision that it may turn out that Hill does not have standing to sue, but not on the basis of a particular type of standing that Tafoya used in ruling against him.

Hill was represented by attorneys of an entity known as Lawyers for Colorado Stream Access.

The Upper Arkansas Water Conservancy District, based in Salida, and the Colorado Water Congress, based in Denver, joined the appeal as "friends of the court" in support of the land owners. Their missions include protecting Colorado water resources.

Efforts in the Legislature to approve laws that might resolve disputes regarding access to rivers have been unsuccessful.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.